netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] inet: Separate DSCP from ECN bits using new dscp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 6 Feb 2022 22:08:15 -0800
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen 
        <toke@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Russell Strong <russell@...ong.id.au>,
        Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] inet: Separate DSCP from ECN bits using new
 dscp_t type

On 2/4/22 5:58 AM, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> The networking stack currently doesn't clearly distinguish between DSCP
> and ECN bits. The entire DSCP+ECN bits are stored in u8 variables (or
> structure fields), and each part of the stack handles them in their own
> way, using different macros. This has created several bugs in the past
> and some uncommon code paths are still unfixed.
> 
> Such bugs generally manifest by selecting invalid routes because of ECN
> bits interfering with FIB routes and rules lookups (more details in the
> LPC 2021 talk[1] and in the RFC of this series[2]).
> 
> This patch series aims at preventing the introduction of such bugs (and
> detecting existing ones), by introducing a dscp_t type, representing
> "sanitised" DSCP values (that is, with no ECN information), as opposed
> to plain u8 values that contain both DSCP and ECN information. dscp_t
> makes it clear for the reader what we're working on, and Sparse can
> flag invalid interactions between dscp_t and plain u8.
> 
> This series converts only a few variables and structures:
> 
>   * Patch 1 converts the tclass field of struct fib6_rule. It
>     effectively forbids the use of ECN bits in the tos/dsfield option
>     of ip -6 rule. Rules now match packets solely based on their DSCP
>     bits, so ECN doesn't influence the result any more. This contrasts
>     with the previous behaviour where all 8 bits of the Traffic Class
>     field were used. It is believed that this change is acceptable as
>     matching ECN bits wasn't usable for IPv4, so only IPv6-only
>     deployments could be depending on it. Also the previous behaviour
>     made DSCP-based ip6-rules fail for packets with both a DSCP and an
>     ECN mark, which is another reason why any such deploy is unlikely.
> 
>   * Patch 2 converts the tos field of struct fib4_rule. This one too
>     effectively forbids defining ECN bits, this time in ip -4 rule.
>     Before that, setting ECN bit 1 was accepted, while ECN bit 0 was
>     rejected. But even when accepted, the rule would never match, as
>     the packets would have their ECN bits cleared before doing the
>     rule lookup.
> 
>   * Patch 3 converts the fc_tos field of struct fib_config. This is
>     equivalent to patch 2, but for IPv4 routes. Routes using a
>     tos/dsfield option with any ECN bit set is now rejected. Before
>     this patch, they were accepted but, as with ip4 rules, these routes
>     couldn't match any packet, since their ECN bits are cleared before
>     the lookup.
> 
>   * Patch 4 converts the fa_tos field of struct fib_alias. This one is
>     pure internal u8 to dscp_t conversion. While patches 1-3 had user
>     facing consequences, this patch shouldn't have any side effect and
>     is there to give an overview of what future conversion patches will
>     look like. Conversions are quite mechanical, but imply some code
>     churn, which is the price for the extra clarity a possibility of
>     type checking.
> 
> To summarise, all the behaviour changes required for the dscp_t type
> approach to work should be contained in patches 1-3. These changes are
> edge cases of ip-route and ip-rule that don't currently work properly.
> So they should be safe. Also, a kernel selftest is added for each of
> them.
> 

seems like the right directions to me.

Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>