lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 6 Feb 2022 21:52:11 -0800
From:   Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) 
        <maheshb@...gle.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Mahesh Bandewar <mahesh@...dewar.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] bonding: pair enable_port with slave_arr_updates

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 7:59 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2022 16:50:30 -0800 Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > >When 803.2ad mode enables a participating port, it should update
> > >the slave-array. I have observed that the member links are participating
> > >and are part of the active aggregator while the traffic is egressing via
> > >only one member link (in a case where two links are participating). Via
> > >krpobes I discovered that that slave-arr has only one link added while
>
> kprobes
> that that
>
> The commit message would use some proof reading in general.
>
:( will fix the typo and send it to you again.

> > >the other participating link wasn't part of the slave-arr.
> > >
> > >I couldn't see what caused that situation but the simple code-walk
> > >through provided me hints that the enable_port wasn't always associated
> > >with the slave-array update.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
>
> Quacks like a fix, no? It's tagged for net-next and no fixes tag,
> is there a reason why?

Though this fixes some corner cases, I couldn't find anything obvious
that I can report as "fixes" hence decided otherwise. Does that make
sense?

thanks,
--mahesh..

Powered by blists - more mailing lists