netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 00/10] net: dsa: microchip: DSA driver support for LAN937x switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 19:31:15 +0530
From:   Prasanna Vengateshan <prasanna.vengateshan@...rochip.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     <andrew@...n.ch>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <olteanv@...il.com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 00/10] net: dsa: microchip: DSA driver
 support for LAN937x switch

On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 19:29 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
> 
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 23:14:50 +0530 Prasanna Vengateshan wrote:
> > LAN937x is a Multi-Port 100BASE-T1 Ethernet Physical Layer switch
> > compliant with the IEEE 802.3bw-2015 specification. The device
> > provides 100 Mbit/s transmit and receive capability over a single
> > Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) cable. LAN937x is successive revision
> > of KSZ series switch. This series of patches provide the DSA driver
> > support for Microchip LAN937X switch and it configures through
> > SPI interface.
> 
> Please CC the driver's maintainer, woojung.huh@...rochip.com on the next
> version.
Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com is already part of the CC list. May be
'netdev/cc_maintainers' does the case sensitive checking. I will correct it in
the next rev. Thanks.

Prasanna