lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220209084355.2q5xjrodusfsudtb@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:43:55 +0100
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@...inx.com>
Cc:     "wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
        "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appanad@...inx.com>,
        Srinivas Goud <sgoud@...inx.com>, git <git@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx_can: Add check for NAPI Poll function

On 09.02.2022 08:40:48, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 2:02 PM
> > To: Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@...inx.com>
> > Cc: wg@...ndegger.com; davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org; Michal
> > Simek <michals@...inx.com>; linux-can@...r.kernel.org;
> > netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org; Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
> > <appanad@...inx.com>; Srinivas Goud <sgoud@...inx.com>; git
> > <git@...inx.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx_can: Add check for NAPI Poll function
> > 
> > On 09.02.2022 08:29:55, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
> > > > On 08.02.2022 21:50:53, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
> > > > > Add check for NAPI poll function to avoid enabling interrupts with
> > > > > out completing the NAPI call.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the patch. Does this fix a bug? If so, please add a Fixes:
> > > > tag that lists the patch that introduced that bug.
> > >
> > > It is not a bug. I am adding additional safety check( Validating the
> > > return value of "napi_complete_done" call).
> > 
> > Thanks for your feedback. Should this go into can or can-next?
> 
> If possible please apply on both branches.

That's not an option. Going for can-next as Michal Simek suggested.

Adding to linux-can-next/testing.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ