[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220209085508.q5ydghkqcne5vtyf@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:55:08 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
linux-can <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] can: gw: use call_rcu() instead of costly
synchronize_rcu()
On 07.02.2022 11:07:06, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> Commit fb8696ab14ad ("can: gw: synchronize rcu operations
> before removing gw job entry") added three synchronize_rcu() calls
> to make sure one rcu grace period was observed before freeing
> a "struct cgw_job" (which are tiny objects).
>
> This should be converted to call_rcu() to avoid adding delays
> in device / network dismantles.
>
> Use the rcu_head that was already in struct cgw_job,
> not yet used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Added to linux-can-next/testing.
Thanks,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists