[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ab523ac-0ab5-5011-5328-e119840e1c07@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 13:41:37 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Melnichenko <andrew@...nix.com>,
Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@...nix.com>
Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Yan Vugenfirer <yan@...nix.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] TUN/VirtioNet USO features support.
在 2022/2/8 下午9:09, Andrew Melnichenko 写道:
> Hi people,
> Can you please review this series?
Are there any performance number to demonstrate the difference?
Thanks
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:32 AM Yuri Benditovich
> <yuri.benditovich@...nix.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:54 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:46:57 +0200, Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@...nix.com> wrote:
>>>> Added new offloads for TUN devices TUN_F_USO4 and TUN_F_USO6.
>>>> Technically they enable NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4
>>>> (and only if USO4 & USO6 are set simultaneously).
>>>> It allows to transmission of large UDP packets.
>>>>
>>>> Different features USO4 and USO6 are required for qemu where Windows guests can
>>>> enable disable USO receives for IPv4 and IPv6 separately.
>>>> On the other side, Linux can't really differentiate USO4 and USO6, for now.
>>>> For now, to enable USO for TUN it requires enabling USO4 and USO6 together.
>>>> In the future, there would be a mechanism to control UDP_L4 GSO separately.
>>>>
>>>> Test it WIP Qemu https://github.com/daynix/qemu/tree/Dev_USOv2
>>>>
>>>> New types for VirtioNet already on mailing:
>>>> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202110/msg00010.html
>>> Seems like this hasn't been upvoted yet.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec#use-of-github-issues
>> Yes, correct. This is a reason why this series of patches is RFC.
>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>> Also, there is a known issue with transmitting packages between two guests.
>>>> Without hacks with skb's GSO - packages are still segmented on the host's postrouting.
>>>>
>>>> Andrew Melnychenko (5):
>>>> uapi/linux/if_tun.h: Added new ioctl for tun/tap.
>>>> driver/net/tun: Added features for USO.
>>>> uapi/linux/virtio_net.h: Added USO types.
>>>> linux/virtio_net.h: Added Support for GSO_UDP_L4 offload.
>>>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c: Added USO support.
>>>>
>>>> drivers/net/tap.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>>>> drivers/net/tun.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>>>> include/linux/virtio_net.h | 11 +++++++++++
>>>> include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h | 3 +++
>>>> include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 4 ++++
>>>> 6 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Virtualization mailing list
>>>> Virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
>>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Powered by blists - more mailing lists