[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABcq3pG3c32b8uHdfNq2LkgCAo8hnOQcY-wQXEG58vPe4FBmUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:05:19 +0200
From: Andrew Melnichenko <andrew@...nix.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: Yuri Benditovich <yuri.benditovich@...nix.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Yan Vugenfirer <yan@...nix.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] TUN/VirtioNet USO features support.
Hi all,
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 7:41 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
> 在 2022/2/8 下午9:09, Andrew Melnichenko 写道:
> > Hi people,
> > Can you please review this series?
>
>
> Are there any performance number to demonstrate the difference?
>
> Thanks
>
Yeah, I've used udpgso_bench from Linux to test.
Here are some numbers:
Sending packets with size 10000
Without USO:
```
$ ./udpgso_bench_tx -4 -D 192.168.15.1 -s 10000 -S 1000
random: crng init done
random: 7 urandom warning(s) missed due to ratelimiting
udp tx: 36 MB/s 3863 calls/s 3863 msg/s
udp tx: 32 MB/s 3360 calls/s 3360 msg/s
udp tx: 31 MB/s 3340 calls/s 3340 msg/s
udp tx: 31 MB/s 3353 calls/s 3353 msg/s
udp tx: 32 MB/s 3359 calls/s 3359 msg/s
udp tx: 32 MB/s 3370 calls/s 3370 msg/s
```
With USO:
```
$ ./udpgso_bench_tx -4 -D 192.168.15.1 -s 10000 -S 1000
random: crng init done
random: 7 urandom warning(s) missed due to ratelimiting
udp tx: 120 MB/s 12596 calls/s 12596 msg/s
udp tx: 122 MB/s 12885 calls/s 12885 msg/s
udp tx: 120 MB/s 12667 calls/s 12667 msg/s
udp tx: 123 MB/s 12969 calls/s 12969 msg/s
udp tx: 116 MB/s 12232 calls/s 12232 msg/s
udp tx: 108 MB/s 11389 calls/s 11389 msg/s
```
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:32 AM Yuri Benditovich
> > <yuri.benditovich@...nix.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:54 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:46:57 +0200, Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@...nix.com> wrote:
> >>>> Added new offloads for TUN devices TUN_F_USO4 and TUN_F_USO6.
> >>>> Technically they enable NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4
> >>>> (and only if USO4 & USO6 are set simultaneously).
> >>>> It allows to transmission of large UDP packets.
> >>>>
> >>>> Different features USO4 and USO6 are required for qemu where Windows guests can
> >>>> enable disable USO receives for IPv4 and IPv6 separately.
> >>>> On the other side, Linux can't really differentiate USO4 and USO6, for now.
> >>>> For now, to enable USO for TUN it requires enabling USO4 and USO6 together.
> >>>> In the future, there would be a mechanism to control UDP_L4 GSO separately.
> >>>>
> >>>> Test it WIP Qemu https://github.com/daynix/qemu/tree/Dev_USOv2
> >>>>
> >>>> New types for VirtioNet already on mailing:
> >>>> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202110/msg00010.html
> >>> Seems like this hasn't been upvoted yet.
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec#use-of-github-issues
> >> Yes, correct. This is a reason why this series of patches is RFC.
> >>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>> Also, there is a known issue with transmitting packages between two guests.
> >>>> Without hacks with skb's GSO - packages are still segmented on the host's postrouting.
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrew Melnychenko (5):
> >>>> uapi/linux/if_tun.h: Added new ioctl for tun/tap.
> >>>> driver/net/tun: Added features for USO.
> >>>> uapi/linux/virtio_net.h: Added USO types.
> >>>> linux/virtio_net.h: Added Support for GSO_UDP_L4 offload.
> >>>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c: Added USO support.
> >>>>
> >>>> drivers/net/tap.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> >>>> drivers/net/tun.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> >>>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> >>>> include/linux/virtio_net.h | 11 +++++++++++
> >>>> include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h | 3 +++
> >>>> include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 4 ++++
> >>>> 6 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.34.1
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Virtualization mailing list
> >>>> Virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> >>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists