netdev - Re: [PATCH] USB: zaurus: support another broken Zaurus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:17:47 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc:     bids.7405@...pond.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: zaurus: support another broken Zaurus

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:13:49PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> 
> On 10.02.22 13:58, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 01:26:43PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >> This SL-6000 says Direct Line, not Ethernet
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >>  drivers/net/usb/zaurus.c    | 12 ++++++++++++
> >>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c b/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c
> >> index eb3817d70f2b..9b4dfa3001d6 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/cdc_ether.c
> >> @@ -583,6 +583,11 @@ static const struct usb_device_id	products[] = {
> >>  	.bInterfaceSubClass	= USB_CDC_SUBCLASS_ETHERNET, \
> >>  	.bInterfaceProtocol	= USB_CDC_PROTO_NONE
> >>  
> >> +#define ZAURUS_FAKE_INTERFACE \
> >> +	.bInterfaceClass	= USB_CLASS_COMM, \
> >> +	.bInterfaceSubClass	= USB_CDC_SUBCLASS_MDLM, \
> >> +	.bInterfaceProtocol	= USB_CDC_PROTO_NONE
> >> +
> >>  /* SA-1100 based Sharp Zaurus ("collie"), or compatible;
> >>   * wire-incompatible with true CDC Ethernet implementations.
> >>   * (And, it seems, needlessly so...)
> >> @@ -636,6 +641,13 @@ static const struct usb_device_id	products[] = {
> >>  	.idProduct              = 0x9032,	/* SL-6000 */
> >>  	ZAURUS_MASTER_INTERFACE,
> >>  	.driver_info		= 0,
> >> +}, {
> >> +	.match_flags    =   USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_INFO
> >> +		 | USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_DEVICE,
> >> +	.idVendor               = 0x04DD,
> >> +	.idProduct              = 0x9032,	/* SL-6000 */
> >> +	ZAURUS_FAKE_INTERFACE,
> >> +	.driver_info		= 0,
> >>  }, {
> >>  	.match_flags    =   USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_INFO
> >>  		 | USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_DEVICE,
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/zaurus.c b/drivers/net/usb/zaurus.c
> >> index 8e717a0b559b..9243be9bd2aa 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/usb/zaurus.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/zaurus.c
> >> @@ -256,6 +256,11 @@ static const struct usb_device_id	products [] = {
> >>  	.bInterfaceSubClass	= USB_CDC_SUBCLASS_ETHERNET, \
> >>  	.bInterfaceProtocol	= USB_CDC_PROTO_NONE
> >>  
> >> +#define ZAURUS_FAKE_INTERFACE \
> >> +	.bInterfaceClass	= USB_CLASS_COMM, \
> >> +	.bInterfaceSubClass	= USB_CDC_SUBCLASS_MDLM, \
> >> +	.bInterfaceProtocol	= USB_CDC_PROTO_NONE
> >> +
> >>  /* SA-1100 based Sharp Zaurus ("collie"), or compatible. */
> >>  {
> >>  	.match_flags	=   USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_INFO
> >> @@ -313,6 +318,13 @@ static const struct usb_device_id	products [] = {
> >>  	.idProduct              = 0x9032,	/* SL-6000 */
> >>  	ZAURUS_MASTER_INTERFACE,
> >>  	.driver_info = ZAURUS_PXA_INFO,
> >> +}, {
> >> +        .match_flags    =   USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_INFO
> >> +                 | USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_DEVICE,
> >> +        .idVendor               = 0x04DD,
> >> +        .idProduct              = 0x9032,       /* SL-6000 */
> >> +        ZAURUS_FAKE_INTERFACE,
> >> +        .driver_info = (unsigned long) &bogus_mdlm_info,
> > No tabs here?
> Checking ...
> >
> > And isn't there a needed "Reported-by:" for this one as it came from a
> > bug report?
> Do we do these for reports by the kernel.org bugzilla?

We should, why not?