[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yga7V1UuC10ao88j@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 20:39:03 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, alsi@...g-olufsen.dk,
arinc.unal@...nc9.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: dsa: tag_rtl8_4: add rtl8_4t tailing
variant
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 11:51:58PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Re: title. Tail or trailing?
>
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 06:13:11PM -0300, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote:
> > +static inline void rtl8_4_write_tag(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> > + char *tag)
> > {
> > struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
> > - __be16 *tag;
> > -
> > - skb_push(skb, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN);
> > -
> > - dsa_alloc_etype_header(skb, RTL8_4_TAG_LEN);
> > - tag = dsa_etype_header_pos_tx(skb);
> > + __be16 *tag16 = (__be16 *)tag;
>
> Can the tail tag be aligned to an odd offset? In that case, should you
> access byte by byte, maybe? I'm not sure how arches handle this.
You should use get_unaligned_be16().
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists