lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 12:02:47 +0100 From: Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org> To: "Drewek, Wojciech" <wojciech.drewek@...el.com> Cc: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com" <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "pablo@...filter.org" <pablo@...filter.org>, "osmocom-net-gprs@...ts.osmocom.org" <osmocom-net-gprs@...ts.osmocom.org> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/5] gtp: Allow to create GTP device without FDs On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:05:54AM +0000, Drewek, Wojciech wrote: > Thanks for triggering CI. > Do I see correctly that results for our changes are the same as for master? The results are identical to master/net-next, so all good! -- - Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists