[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ygv8wY75hNqS7zO6@unreal>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 21:19:29 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
target-devel@...r.kernel.org, mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, sparmaintainer@...sys.com,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...ica.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] treewide: Replace zero-length arrays with
flexible-array members
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:21:10PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:17:40AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:47:43AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare
> > > having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure.
> > > Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these
> > > cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should
> > > no longer be used[2].
> > >
> > > This code was transformed with the help of Coccinelle:
> > > (next-20220214$ spatch --jobs $(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN) --sp-file script.cocci --include-headers --dir . > output.patch)
> > >
> > > @@
> > > identifier S, member, array;
> > > type T1, T2;
> > > @@
> > >
> > > struct S {
> > > ...
> > > T1 member;
> > > T2 array[
> > > - 0
> > > ];
> > > };
> >
> > These all look trivially correct to me. Only two didn't have the end of
> > the struct visible in the patch, and checking those showed them to be
> > trailing members as well, so:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>
> I'll add this to my -next tree.
I would like to ask you to send mlx5 patch separately to netdev. We are working
to delete that file completely and prefer to avoid from unnecessary merge conflicts.
Thanks
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists