netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/2] staging: wfx: apply SDIO suggestions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 11:35:25 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] staging: wfx: apply SDIO suggestions

On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 10:31, Jerome Pouiller
<Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
>
> Hi Ulf, Greg,
>
> The second patch of this series touch to the staging tree and to the MMC
> framework. I don't know what is the rule for these cases, but I think it
> makes more sense to carry this patch with the staging tree.

I don't believe the changes to the mmc core will cause any merge
conflict, so feel free to funnel this through whatever tree makes best
sense.

For the series:
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>

Kind regards
Uffe

>
>
> Jérôme Pouiller (2):
>   staging: wfx: WF200 has no official SDIO IDs
>   staging: wfx: apply the necessary SDIO quirks for the Silabs WF200
>
>  drivers/mmc/core/quirks.h      | 5 +++++
>  drivers/staging/wfx/bus_sdio.c | 8 ++------
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>