netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: wfx: apply the necessary SDIO quirks for the Silabs WF200

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 11:59:24 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: wfx: apply the necessary SDIO quirks for the Silabs WF200

Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com> writes:

> From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
>
> Until now, the SDIO quirks are applied directly from the driver.
> However, it is better to apply the quirks before driver probing. So,
> this patch relocate the quirks in the MMC framework.

It would be good to know how this is better, what's the concrete
advantage?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches