[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220217183001.1876034-1-song@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:30:01 -0800
From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
<kernel-team@...com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
<syzbot+2f649ec6d2eea1495a8f@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
<syzbot+ecb1e7e51c52f68f7481@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
<syzbot+87f65c75f4a72db05445@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: bpf_prog_pack: set proper size before freeing ro_header
bpf_prog_pack_free() uses header->size to decide whether the header
should be freed with module_memfree() or the bpf_prog_pack logic.
However, in kvmalloc() failure path of bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc(),
header->size is not set yet. As a result, bpf_prog_pack_free() may treat
a slice of a pack as a standalone kvmalloc'd header and call
module_memfree() on the whole pack. This in turn causes use-after-free by
other users of the pack.
Fix this by setting ro_header->size before freeing ro_header.
Fixes: 33c9805860e5 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_jit_binary_pack_[alloc|finalize|free]")
Reported-by: syzbot+2f649ec6d2eea1495a8f@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+ecb1e7e51c52f68f7481@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+87f65c75f4a72db05445@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
---
kernel/bpf/core.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 44623c9b5bb1..ebb0193d07f0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1069,6 +1069,7 @@ bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc(unsigned int proglen, u8 **image_ptr,
*rw_header = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!*rw_header) {
+ bpf_arch_text_copy(&ro_header->size, &size, sizeof(size));
bpf_prog_pack_free(ro_header);
bpf_jit_uncharge_modmem(size);
return NULL;
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists