netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sparx5: Support offloading of bridge port flooding flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Feb 2022 20:26:36 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Casper Andersson <casper@...an.se>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sparx5: Support offloading of bridge port
 flooding flags

On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 09:01:30 +0000 Casper Andersson wrote:
> On 22/02/17 08:18, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:45:38 +0000 Casper Andersson wrote:
> >
> > Can others see this patch? My email client apparently does not have
> > enough PGP support enabled. I'm worried I'm not the only one. That said
> > lore and patchwork seem to have gotten it just fine:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220217144534.sqntzdjltzvxslqo@wse-c0155/
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220217144534.sqntzdjltzvxslqo@wse-c0155/  
> 
> I apologize. This seems to be Protonmail's doing. When I look at the
> web interface for Protonmail I can see that you are the only recipient
> it says PGP encrypted for. This is probably because Protonmail will
> automatically encrypt when both ends use Protonmail. Though I do not see
> this indication on your reply. I tried switching to PGP/Inline instead
> of PGP/MIME for this message. I hope this works.  Otherwise, I can
> resubmit this patch using another email address. I did not find a way
> to disable the automatic encryption. Or if you have any other
> suggestions to get around this.

If I'm the only one who didn't get the plain text version - it's not 
a big deal.

Steen, can we get a review?