netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sparx5: Support offloading of bridge port flooding flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 19 Feb 2022 15:56:48 +0100
From:   Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Casper Andersson <casper@...an.se>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Lars Povlsen" <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sparx5: Support offloading of bridge port
 flooding flags

The 02/18/2022 20:26, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

Hi

> 
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 09:01:30 +0000 Casper Andersson wrote:
> > On 22/02/17 08:18, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:45:38 +0000 Casper Andersson wrote:
> > >
> > > Can others see this patch? My email client apparently does not have
> > > enough PGP support enabled. I'm worried I'm not the only one. That said
> > > lore and patchwork seem to have gotten it just fine:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220217144534.sqntzdjltzvxslqo@wse-c0155/
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220217144534.sqntzdjltzvxslqo@wse-c0155/
> >
> > I apologize. This seems to be Protonmail's doing. When I look at the
> > web interface for Protonmail I can see that you are the only recipient
> > it says PGP encrypted for. This is probably because Protonmail will
> > automatically encrypt when both ends use Protonmail. Though I do not see
> > this indication on your reply. I tried switching to PGP/Inline instead
> > of PGP/MIME for this message. I hope this works.  Otherwise, I can
> > resubmit this patch using another email address. I did not find a way
> > to disable the automatic encryption. Or if you have any other
> > suggestions to get around this.
> 
> If I'm the only one who didn't get the plain text version - it's not
> a big deal.

I also have problems seeing Casper's patch.

The only comment that I have to the patch, it would be nice to implement
also the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PRE_BRIDGE_FLAGS callback. But I presume
that can be added later on.

> 
> Steen, can we get a review?

-- 
/Horatiu