[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220224101543.707986e0@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:15:43 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Cc: "richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"Mekala, SunithaX D" <sunithax.d.mekala@...el.com>,
"Mishra, Sudhansu Sekhar" <sudhansu.mishra@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Kolacinski, Karol" <karol.kolacinski@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] ice: add TTY for GNSS module for E810T
device
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:26:15 +0000 Nguyen, Anthony L wrote:
> If you're okay with this, it looks like this patch still applies
> cleanly. Would you like me to resend it or did you want to use this
> one?
Are we talking about this?
+struct ice_aqc_i2c {
+ struct ice_aqc_link_topo_addr topo_addr;
+ __le16 i2c_addr;
+ u8 i2c_params;
+#define ICE_AQC_I2C_DATA_SIZE_S 0
+#define ICE_AQC_I2C_DATA_SIZE_M (0xF << ICE_AQC_I2C_DATA_SIZE_S)
+#define ICE_AQC_I2C_USE_REPEATED_START BIT(7)
+ u8 rsvd;
+ __le16 i2c_bus_addr;
+ u8 rsvd2[4];
+};
You can definitely improve it, even with the defines "inline" I'm
not sure looking at this code which field those defines pertain to.
I'm guessing it's i2c_params because the next one is rsvd. Plus you
should use kernel FIELD_* or filed_* accessors instead of defining
masks and shifts separately. I think I'm with Richard.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists