[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41819a56-4da8-cc49-c42c-700d599c7af3@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 13:59:39 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/2] bpf, arm64: fix bpf line info
On 2/26/22 1:19 PM, Hou Tao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The patchset addresses two issues in bpf line info for arm64:
>
> (1) insn_to_jit_off only considers the body itself and ignores
> prologue before the body. Fixed in patch #1.
>
> (2) insn_to_jit_off passed to bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo() is
> calculated in instruction granularity instead of bytes
> granularity. Fixed in patch #2.
>
> Comments are always welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Tao
LGTM, applied, thanks Hou!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists