[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220306164220.GB6290@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 08:42:20 -0800
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
Cc: yangbo.lu@....com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
mlichvar@...hat.com, vinicius.gomes@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 4/6] ptp: Support time stamps based on free
running time
On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 09:56:56AM +0100, Gerhard Engleder wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 2be263184d1e..2ec8d944a557 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -521,6 +521,8 @@ static inline bool skb_frag_must_loop(struct page *p)
> * struct skb_shared_hwtstamps - hardware time stamps
> * @hwtstamp: hardware time stamp transformed into duration
> * since arbitrary point in time
> + * @hwfreeruntstamp: hardware time stamp based on free running time
> + * transformed into duration since arbitrary point in time
> *
> * Software time stamps generated by ktime_get_real() are stored in
> * skb->tstamp.
> @@ -533,6 +535,7 @@ static inline bool skb_frag_must_loop(struct page *p)
> */
> struct skb_shared_hwtstamps {
> ktime_t hwtstamp;
> + ktime_t hwfreeruntstamp;
You are adding eight bytes per frame for what is arguably an extreme
niche case. I personally wouldn't mind, but expect push back from the
rest of the world!
Maybe this should hide behind a Kconfig option with default off.
@davem, @kuba, what do you think?
> };
>
> /* Definitions for tx_flags in struct skb_shared_info */
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists