lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 08:49:41 -0800 From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> To: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com> Cc: yangbo.lu@....com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, mlichvar@...hat.com, vinicius.gomes@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] ptp: Support hardware clocks with additional free running time On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 09:56:52AM +0100, Gerhard Engleder wrote: > If hardware would support a free running time additionally to the > physical clock, then the physical clock does not need to be forced to > free running. Thus, the physical clocks can still be synchronized while > vclocks are in use. So... the HW must provide frame time stamps using the one clock and ancillary operations using the other, right? Thanks, Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists