netdev - Re: net: stmmac: dwmac-meson8b: interface sometimes does not come up at boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1j5yonnp1a.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date:   Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:57:27 +0100
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To:     Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: net: stmmac: dwmac-meson8b: interface sometimes does not come
 up at boot


On Wed 09 Mar 2022 at 15:45, Erico Nunes <nunes.erico@...il.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 1:56 PM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
>> You could try the following (quick and dirty) test patch that fully mimics
>> the vendor driver as found here:
>> https://github.com/khadas/linux/blob/buildroot-aml-4.9/drivers/amlogic/ethernet/phy/amlogic.c
>>
>> First apply
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/commit/?id=a502a8f04097e038c3daa16c5202a9538116d563
>> This patch is in the net tree currently and should show up in linux-next
>> beginning of the week.
>>
>> On top please apply the following (it includes the test patch your working with).
>
> I triggered test jobs with this configuration (latest mainline +
> a502a8f0409 + test patch for vendor driver behaviour), and the results
> are pretty much the same as with the previous test patch from this
> thread only.
> That is, I never got the issue with non-functional link up anymore,
> but I get the (rare) issue with link not going up.
> The reproducibility is still extremely low, in the >1% range.

Low reproducibility means the problem is still there, or at least not
understood completly.

I understand the benefit from the user standpoint.

Heiner if you are going to continue from the test patch you sent,
I would welcome some explanation with each of the changes.

We know very little about this IP and I'm not very confortable with
tweaking/aligning with AML sdk "blindly" on a driver that has otherwise
been working well so far.

Thx

>
> So at this point, I'm not sure how much more effort to invest into
> this. Given the rate is very low and the fallback is it will just
> reset the link and proceed to work, I think the situation would
> already be much better with the solution from that test patch being
> merged. If you propose that as a patch separately, I'm happy to test
> the final submitted patch again and provide feedback there. Or if
> there is another solution to try, I can try with that too.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Erico