[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14cf7c22-622b-d5e2-0eb1-076d92db56a2@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:14:55 +0100
From: Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Chris Snook <chris.snook@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alx: acquire mutex for alx_reinit in alx_change_mtu
On 11/03/2022 00:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 17:13:16 +0100 Niels Dossche wrote:
>> alx_reinit has a lockdep assertion that the alx->mtx mutex must be held.
>> alx_reinit is called from two places: alx_reset and alx_change_mtu.
>> alx_reset does acquire alx->mtx before calling alx_reinit.
>> alx_change_mtu does not acquire this mutex, nor do its callers or any
>> path towards alx_change_mtu.
>> Acquire the mutex in alx_change_mtu.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@...il.com>
>
> What's the Fixes tag?
Commit 4a5fe57e7751 ("alx: use fine-grained locking instead of RTNL")
introduced fine-grained locking and introduced the assertion.
I can resend the patch with the Fixes tag if you want me to.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists