[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220310152040.0389f6c1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:20:40 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Chris Snook <chris.snook@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alx: acquire mutex for alx_reinit in alx_change_mtu
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:14:55 +0100 Niels Dossche wrote:
> On 11/03/2022 00:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 17:13:16 +0100 Niels Dossche wrote:
> >> alx_reinit has a lockdep assertion that the alx->mtx mutex must be held.
> >> alx_reinit is called from two places: alx_reset and alx_change_mtu.
> >> alx_reset does acquire alx->mtx before calling alx_reinit.
> >> alx_change_mtu does not acquire this mutex, nor do its callers or any
> >> path towards alx_change_mtu.
> >> Acquire the mutex in alx_change_mtu.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@...il.com>
> >
> > What's the Fixes tag?
>
> Commit 4a5fe57e7751 ("alx: use fine-grained locking instead of RTNL")
> introduced fine-grained locking and introduced the assertion.
> I can resend the patch with the Fixes tag if you want me to.
If you don't mind resend would be helpful, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists