[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJOw3ETTUxZOi+5MXZTuuBqRtDvOd4RwVK8mGOBPMNoBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:01:34 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>,
Coco Li <lixiaoyan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 06/14] ipv6/gro: insert temporary HBH/jumbo header
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 8:24 AM Alexander H Duyck
<alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2022-03-09 at 21:46 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >
> > Following patch will add GRO_IPV6_MAX_SIZE, allowing gro to build
> > BIG TCP ipv6 packets (bigger than 64K).
> >
>
> This looks like it belongs in the next patch, not this one. This patch
> is adding the HBH header.
What do you mean by "it belongs" ?
Do you want me to squash the patches, or remove the first sentence ?
I am confused.
>
> > This patch changes ipv6_gro_complete() to insert a HBH/jumbo header
> > so that resulting packet can go through IPv6/TCP stacks.
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists