[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjD2wbXm8XFiXgI8@salvia>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 21:27:45 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 2/6] netfilter: nf_tables: Reject tables of
unsupported family
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 11:56:44AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 10:15:09 +0100 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > + return false
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_TABLES_INET
> > + || family == NFPROTO_INET
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_TABLES_IPV4
> > + || family == NFPROTO_IPV4
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_TABLES_ARP
> > + || family == NFPROTO_ARP
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NF_TABLES_NETDEV
> > + || family == NFPROTO_NETDEV
> > +#endif
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_TABLES_BRIDGE)
>
> is there a reason this one is IS_ENABLED() and everything else is ifdef?
bridge might be compiled as a module, if the bridge infrastructure
also comes a module as well.
Anything else is either built-in or off.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists