netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: mvneta: Armada 98DX2530 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ca07b0a6-bc9b-714b-82cf-f778341169c6@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date:   Tue, 15 Mar 2022 20:28:10 +0000
From:   Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com" <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net: mvneta: Armada 98DX2530 SoC


On 15/03/22 18:35, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:17:40 +1300 Chris Packham wrote:
>> This is split off from [1] to let it go in via net-next rather than waiting for
>> the rest of the series to land.
>>
>> [1] - https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=20988&d=nKWw4otBS8no711-ly1FNC4uR0v3LkysRvdxYwm1Rg&u=https%3a%2f%2flore%2ekernel%2eorg%2flkml%2f20220314213143%2e2404162-1-chris%2epackham%40alliedtelesis%2eco%2enz%2f
> Patchwork says it doesn't apply cleanly to net-next [1].
> Could you double check?
>
> [1] https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=20988&d=nKWw4otBS8no711-ly1FNC4uR0v3LkysRqx8aF21QQ&u=https%3a%2f%2fgit%2ekernel%2eorg%2fpub%2fscm%2flinux%2fkernel%2fgit%2fnetdev%2fnet-next%2egit%2f
Yeah sorry looks like this will clash with 72bb9531162a ("net: mvneta: 
reorder initialisation"). I'll rebase my branch on top of 
net-next/master. The logical change is simple enough but I can see why 
git am would object.