netdev - Re: [net-next] can: isotp: sanitize CAN ID checks in isotp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:48:02 +0100
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+2339c27f5c66c652843e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [net-next] can: isotp: sanitize CAN ID checks in isotp_bind()

On 16.03.2022 08:35:58, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> 
> 
> On 16.03.22 02:51, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 21:37:48 +0100 Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> > > Syzbot created an environment that lead to a state machine status that
> > > can not be reached with a compliant CAN ID address configuration.
> > > The provided address information consisted of CAN ID 0x6000001 and 0xC28001
> > > which both boil down to 11 bit CAN IDs 0x001 in sending and receiving.
> > > 
> > > Sanitize the SFF/EFF CAN ID values before performing the address checks.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: e057dd3fc20f ("can: add ISO 15765-2:2016 transport protocol")
> > > Reported-by: syzbot+2339c27f5c66c652843e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
> > 
> > CC Marc, please make sure you CC maintainers.
> 
> Oh, that would have been better! I'm maintaining the CAN network layer stuff
> together with Marc and there was no relevant stuff in can-next to be pulled
> in the next days. So I sent it directly to hit the merge window and had all
> of us in the reply to the syzbot report.
> 
> Will CC Marc next time when posting to netdev only!
> 
> Maybe I treated this patch more urgent than it needed to be handled
> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Should this go into net/master with stable on Cc or to net-next?

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)