| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <BY3PR18MB46129020BC8C93377CA16FB8AB129@BY3PR18MB4612.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 09:55:58 +0000
From: Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
"regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"it+netdev@...gen.mpg.de" <it+netdev@...gen.mpg.de>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net] bnx2x: fix built-in kernel driver load
failure
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022 1:03 PM
> To: Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; kuba@...nel.org; Ariel Elior
> <aelior@...vell.com>; regressions@...ts.linux.dev; stable@...r.kernel.org;
> it+netdev@...gen.mpg.de
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net] bnx2x: fix built-in kernel driver load failure
>
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dear Manish,
>
>
> Am 16.03.22 um 22:46 schrieb Manish Chopra:
> > commit b7a49f73059f ("bnx2x: Utilize firmware 7.13.21.0") added
> > request_firmware() logic in probe() which caused built-in kernel
> > driver (CONFIG_BNX2X=y) load failure (below), as access to firmware
> > file is not feasible during the probe.
>
> I think it’s important to document, that the firmware was not present in the
> initrd.
I believe this problem has nothing to do with initrd module/FW but rather a module built in the kernel/vmlinuz (CONFIG_BNX2X=y) itself,
A module load from initrd works fine and can access the initrd FW files present in initrd file system even during the probe. For example,
when I had CONFIG_BNX2X=m, it loads the module fine from initrd with FW files present in initrd file system. When I had CONFIG_BNX2X=y,
which I believe doesn't install/load module in/from initrd but in kernel (vmlinuz) itself, that's where it can't access the firmware file and cause the load failure.
>
>
>
> > "Direct firmware load for bnx2x/bnx2x-e2-7.13.21.0.fw
> > failed with error -2"
>
> I’d say, no line break for log message. Maybe paste the excerpt below:
>
> [ 20.534985] bnx2x 0000:45:00.0: msix capability found
> [ 20.540342] bnx2x 0000:45:00.0: part number
> 394D4342-31373735-31314131-473331
> [ 20.548605] bnx2x 0000:45:00.0: Direct firmware load for
> bnx2x/bnx2x-e1h-7.13.21.0.fw failed with error -2
> [ 20.558373] bnx2x 0000:45:00.0: Direct firmware load for
> bnx2x/bnx2x-e1h-7.13.15.0.fw failed with error -2
> [ 20.568319] bnx2x: probe of 0000:45:00.0 failed with error -2
>
> > This patch fixes this issue by -
> >
> > 1. Removing request_firmware() logic from the probe()
> > such that .ndo_open() handle it as it used to handle
> > it earlier
> >
> > 2. Given request_firmware() is removed from probe(), so
> > driver has to relax FW version comparisons a bit against
> > the already loaded FW version (by some other PFs of same
> > adapter) to allow different compatible/close FWs with which
> > multiple PFs may run with (in different environments), as the
> > given PF who is in probe flow has no idea now with which firmware
> > file version it is going to initialize the device in ndo_open()
>
> Please be specific and state, that the revision part in the version has
> to be greater, and that downgrading is not allowed.
I didn't get it, you can't downgrade to any firmware unless you downgrade the kernel/driver, driver with these
recent commits/fixes are always supposed to run with this minimum older FW version (7.13.15.0) or a greater
FW version (for example now 7.13.21.0). if you want to use the FW version even older to these then you have to
downgrade the driver/kernel as well which won't have these commits/logics in them.
>
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Link: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__lore.kernel.org_all_46f2d9d9-2Dae7f-2Db332-2Dddeb-
> 2Db59802be2bab-
> 40molgen.mpg.de_&d=DwIDaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=bMTgx2X4
> 8QVXyXOEL8ALyI4dsWoR-m74c5n3d-ruJI8&m=FmUvhi_ygxQI4mnQmg5pU-
> th-BWb_aEXUni5bpt6e934rZh0Wp-
> KuVdfW7N2O0za&s=t3mHF8L4_cacsuvE5TqHUBSqD70Yfsbk3or973FvyEQ&e=
> > Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
> > Tested-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
> > Fixes: b7a49f73059f ("bnx2x: Utilize firmware 7.13.21.0")
> > Signed-off-by: Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h | 2 --
> > .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c | 28 +++++++++++--------
> > .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 15 ++--------
> > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
> > index a19dd6797070..2209d99b3404 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x.h
> > @@ -2533,6 +2533,4 @@ void bnx2x_register_phc(struct bnx2x *bp);
> > * Meant for implicit re-load flows.
> > */
> > int bnx2x_vlan_reconfigure_vid(struct bnx2x *bp);
> > -int bnx2x_init_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp);
> > -void bnx2x_release_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp);
> > #endif /* bnx2x.h */
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c
> > index 8d36ebbf08e1..5729a5ab059d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_cmn.c
> > @@ -2364,24 +2364,30 @@ int bnx2x_compare_fw_ver(struct bnx2x *bp,
> u32 load_code, bool print_err)
> > /* is another pf loaded on this engine? */
> > if (load_code != FW_MSG_CODE_DRV_LOAD_COMMON_CHIP &&
> > load_code != FW_MSG_CODE_DRV_LOAD_COMMON) {
> > - /* build my FW version dword */
> > - u32 my_fw = (bp->fw_major) + (bp->fw_minor << 8) +
> > - (bp->fw_rev << 16) + (bp->fw_eng << 24);
> > + u8 loaded_fw_major, loaded_fw_minor, loaded_fw_rev,
> loaded_fw_eng;
> > + u32 loaded_fw;
> >
> > /* read loaded FW from chip */
> > - u32 loaded_fw = REG_RD(bp, XSEM_REG_PRAM);
> > + loaded_fw = REG_RD(bp, XSEM_REG_PRAM);
> >
> > - DP(BNX2X_MSG_SP, "loaded fw %x, my fw %x\n",
> > - loaded_fw, my_fw);
> > + loaded_fw_major = loaded_fw & 0xff;
> > + loaded_fw_minor = (loaded_fw >> 8) & 0xff;
> > + loaded_fw_rev = (loaded_fw >> 16) & 0xff;
> > + loaded_fw_eng = (loaded_fw >> 24) & 0xff;
> > +
> > + DP(BNX2X_MSG_SP, "loaded fw 0x%x major 0x%x minor 0x%x
> rev 0x%x eng 0x%x\n",
> > + loaded_fw, loaded_fw_major, loaded_fw_minor,
> loaded_fw_rev, loaded_fw_eng);
> >
> > /* abort nic load if version mismatch */
> > - if (my_fw != loaded_fw) {
> > + if (loaded_fw_major != BCM_5710_FW_MAJOR_VERSION ||
> > + loaded_fw_minor != BCM_5710_FW_MINOR_VERSION ||
> > + loaded_fw_eng != BCM_5710_FW_ENGINEERING_VERSION
> ||
>
> The engineering version comes after the revision, so I’d assume they can
> also be relaxed and differ?
We don't change the engineering version at all, it's just for sanity and going to always remain as zero.
We use this only for debugging purpose, to differentiate debug FW version vs official FW version.
>
> > + loaded_fw_rev < BCM_5710_FW_REVISION_VERSION_V15)
> {
> > if (print_err)
>
> Unrelated, this print_err argument added in commit 91ebb929b6f8 (bnx2x:
> Add support for Multi-Function UNDI) is not so elegant.
>
> > - BNX2X_ERR("bnx2x with FW %x was already
> loaded which mismatches my %x FW. Aborting\n",
> > - loaded_fw, my_fw);
> > + BNX2X_ERR("loaded FW incompatible.
> Aborting\n");
>
> Please add the versions to the error message to give the user more clues.
I didn't keep it purposely here (to get rid of 100 chars warning) :- ), given the debug print just before this already logs
all the version info about the already loaded_fw which can be enabled to get those info. I would prefer a sperate commit
on refining/enabling messages or adding any new informative messages for user about FW versioning related.
>
> > else
> > - BNX2X_DEV_INFO("bnx2x with FW %x was
> already loaded which mismatches my %x FW, possibly due to MF UNDI\n",
> > - loaded_fw, my_fw);
> > + BNX2X_DEV_INFO("loaded FW incompatible,
> possibly due to MF UNDI\n");
> > +
> > return -EBUSY;
> > }
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
> > index eedb48d945ed..c19b072f3a23 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
> > @@ -12319,15 +12319,6 @@ static int bnx2x_init_bp(struct bnx2x *bp)
> >
> > bnx2x_read_fwinfo(bp);
> >
> > - if (IS_PF(bp)) {
> > - rc = bnx2x_init_firmware(bp);
> > -
> > - if (rc) {
> > - bnx2x_free_mem_bp(bp);
> > - return rc;
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
> > func = BP_FUNC(bp);
> >
> > /* need to reset chip if undi was active */
> > @@ -12340,7 +12331,6 @@ static int bnx2x_init_bp(struct bnx2x *bp)
> >
> > rc = bnx2x_prev_unload(bp);
> > if (rc) {
> > - bnx2x_release_firmware(bp);
> > bnx2x_free_mem_bp(bp);
> > return rc;
> > }
> > @@ -13409,7 +13399,7 @@ do {
> \
> > (u8 *)bp->arr, len); \
> > } while (0)
> >
> > -int bnx2x_init_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp)
> > +static int bnx2x_init_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp)
> > {
> > const char *fw_file_name, *fw_file_name_v15;
> > struct bnx2x_fw_file_hdr *fw_hdr;
> > @@ -13509,7 +13499,7 @@ int bnx2x_init_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp)
> > return rc;
> > }
> >
> > -void bnx2x_release_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp)
> > +static void bnx2x_release_firmware(struct bnx2x *bp)
> > {
> > kfree(bp->init_ops_offsets);
> > kfree(bp->init_ops);
> > @@ -14026,7 +14016,6 @@ static int bnx2x_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > return 0;
> >
> > init_one_freemem:
> > - bnx2x_release_firmware(bp);
> > bnx2x_free_mem_bp(bp);
> >
> > init_one_exit:
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists