netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: icmp: add reasons of the skb drops to icmp protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADxym3YM9FMFrTirxWQF7aDOpoEGq5bC4-xm2p0mF8shP+Q0Hw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 09:37:46 +0800
From:   Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, xeb@...l.ru,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Talal Ahmad <talalahmad@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
        Hao Peng <flyingpeng@...cent.com>,
        Mengen Sun <mengensun@...cent.com>, dongli.zhang@...cle.com,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Biao Jiang <benbjiang@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/3] net: icmp: add reasons of the skb drops
 to icmp protocol

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:48 PM David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/16/22 10:05 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:35:47 -0600 David Ahern wrote:
> >> On 3/16/22 9:18 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I guess this set raises the follow up question to Dave if adding
> >>> drop reasons to places with MIB exception stats means improving
> >>> the granularity or one MIB stat == one reason?
> >>
> >> There are a few examples where multiple MIB stats are bumped on a drop,
> >> but the reason code should always be set based on first failure. Did you
> >> mean something else with your question?
> >
> > I meant whether we want to differentiate between TYPE, and BROADCAST or
> > whatever other possible invalid protocol cases we can get here or just
> > dump them all into a single protocol error code.
>
> I think a single one is a good starting point.

Ok, I'll try my best to make a V4 base this way...Is there any inspiration?

Such as we make SKB_DROP_REASON_PTYPE_ABSENT to
SKB_DROP_REASON_L2_PROTO, which means the L2 protocol is not
supported or invalied.

And use SKB_DROP_REASON_L4_PROTO for the L4 protocol problem,
such as GRE version not supported, ICMP type not supported, etc.

Sounds nice, isn't it?