netdev - [PATCH 14/14] bpf: selftests: Add test case for BPF_F_PROG_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 19 Mar 2022 17:30:36 +0000
From:   Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To:     roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 14/14] bpf: selftests: Add test case for BPF_F_PROG_NO_CHARGE

Test case to check if BPF_F_PROG_NO_CHARGE valid.
The result as follows,
 $ ./test_progs
 ...
 #103 no_charge:OK
 ...

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/no_charge.c      | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/no_charge.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/no_charge.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/no_charge.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..85fbd2ccbc71
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/no_charge.c
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <sys/syscall.h>
+
+#include "test_progs.h"
+
+#define BPF_ALU64_IMM(OP, DST, IMM)					\
+	((struct bpf_insn) {							\
+		.code  = BPF_ALU64 | BPF_OP(OP) | BPF_K,	\
+		.dst_reg = DST,								\
+		.src_reg = 0,								\
+		.off   = 0,									\
+		.imm   = IMM })
+
+#define BPF_EXIT_INSN()					\
+	((struct bpf_insn) {				\
+		.code  = BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT,	\
+		.dst_reg = 0,					\
+		.src_reg = 0,					\
+		.off   = 0,						\
+		.imm   = 0 })
+
+void test_no_charge(void)
+{
+	struct bpf_insn prog[] = {
+		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	};
+	union bpf_attr attr;
+	int duration = 0;
+	int fd;
+
+	bzero(&attr, sizeof(attr));
+	attr.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS;
+	attr.insn_cnt = 2;
+	attr.insns = (__u64)prog;
+	attr.license = (__u64)("GPL");
+	attr.prog_flags |= BPF_F_PROG_NO_CHARGE;
+
+	fd = syscall(__NR_bpf, BPF_PROG_LOAD, &attr, sizeof(attr));
+	CHECK(fd < 0 && fd != -EPERM, "no_charge", "error: %s\n",
+			strerror(errno));
+
+	if (fd > 0)
+		close(fd);
+}
-- 
2.17.1