[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3eb95fd0-2046-c000-9c0b-c7c7e05ce04a@163.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 21:04:57 +0800
From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo106@....com>
To: dsahern@...nel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
menglong8.dong@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next] tcp: make tcp_rcv_state_process() drop monitor
friendly
From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...natelecom.cn>
In tcp_rcv_state_process(), should not call tcp_drop() for same case,
like after process ACK packet in TCP_LAST_ACK state, it should call
consume_skb() instead of tcp_drop() to be drop monitor friendly,
otherwise every last ack will be report as dropped packet by drop monitor.
Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...natelecom.cn>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 2088f93..feb6f83 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -6574,7 +6574,8 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
inet_csk_reset_keepalive_timer(sk, tmo);
} else {
tcp_time_wait(sk, TCP_FIN_WAIT2, tmo);
- goto discard;
+ consume_skb(skb);
+ return 0;
}
break;
}
@@ -6582,7 +6583,8 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
case TCP_CLOSING:
if (tp->snd_una == tp->write_seq) {
tcp_time_wait(sk, TCP_TIME_WAIT, 0);
- goto discard;
+ consume_skb(skb);
+ return 0;
}
break;
@@ -6590,7 +6592,8 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (tp->snd_una == tp->write_seq) {
tcp_update_metrics(sk);
tcp_done(sk);
- goto discard;
+ consume_skb(skb);
+ return 0;
}
break;
}
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists