lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 14:43:13 +0100 From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Asias He <asias@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/3] vsock/virtio: enable VQs early on probe and finish the setup before using them On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:22:02AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:49:51AM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> The first patch fixes a virtio-spec violation. The other two patches >> complete the driver configuration before using the VQs in the probe. >> >> The patch order should simplify backporting in stable branches. > >Ok but I think the order is wrong. It should be 2-3-1, >otherwise bisect can pick just 1 and it will have >the issues previous reviw pointed out. Right, I prioritized simplifying the backport, but obviously bisectability is priority! I'll send v3 changing the order in 2-3-1 Thanks, Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists