[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANr-f5wrm7ASB61-rR9VPF5ePYC4gb4W-1rM5Ym7TixwMQv_Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:43:44 +0100
From: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: yangbo.lu@....com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, mlichvar@...hat.com,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/6] ptp: Request cycles for TX timestamp
> > @@ -683,9 +683,17 @@ void __sock_tx_timestamp(__u16 tsflags, __u8 *tx_flags)
> > {
> > u8 flags = *tx_flags;
> >
> > - if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE)
> > + if (tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_HARDWARE) {
> > flags |= SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP;
> >
> > + /* PTP hardware clocks can provide a free running time called
> > + * cycles as base for virtual clocks.
>
> "PTP hardware clocks can provide a free running cycle counter as a
> time base for virtual clocks."
I'll use your wording here. I'll also update other comments and commit messages
with this wording.
Thanks,
Gerhard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists