[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkHCUbWxaqDJeQoK@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 16:12:33 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next 1/5] net: mdio: fwnode: add fwnode_mdiobus_register()
> With this series, fwnode_mdiobus_register() supports exactly the same
> subset that is supported by of_mdiobus_register().
I need to see the side-by-side conversion. But it looked to me you did
not support everything in DT.
And another question is, should it support everything in DT. The DT
binding has things which are deprecated. We have to support them in
DT, they are ABI. But anything new should not be using them.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists