lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 16:12:33 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com> Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [net-next 1/5] net: mdio: fwnode: add fwnode_mdiobus_register() > With this series, fwnode_mdiobus_register() supports exactly the same > subset that is supported by of_mdiobus_register(). I need to see the side-by-side conversion. But it looked to me you did not support everything in DT. And another question is, should it support everything in DT. The DT binding has things which are deprecated. We have to support them in DT, they are ABI. But anything new should not be using them. Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists