[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220328191753.33b1910e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 19:17:53 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] veth: Support bonding events
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 10:14:17 +0200 Alexandra Winter wrote:
> +static bool _is_veth(const struct net_device *dev)
netif_is_veth()?
> +{
> + return (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_open == veth_open);
Why compare ndo_open and not entire netdev_ops or rtnl_link_ops?
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists