lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20220328191422.2acecf5f@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 19:14:22 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] veth: Support bonding events On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 10:14:16 +0200 Alexandra Winter wrote: > In case virtual instances are attached to an external network via veth > and a bridge, the interface to the external network can be a bond > interface. Bonding drivers generate specific events during failover > that trigger switch updates. When a veth device is attached to a > bridge with a bond interface, we want external switches to learn about > the veth devices as well. Can you please add an ASCII diagram of a setup your trying to describe? > Without this patch we have seen cases where recovery after bond > failover took an unacceptable amount of time (depending on timeout > settings in the network). > > Due to the symmetric nature of veth special care is required to avoid > endless notification loops. Therefore we only notify from a veth > bridgeport to a peer that is not a bridgeport. > > References: > Same handling as for macvlan: > 4c9912556867 ("macvlan: Support bonding events" > and vlan: > 4aa5dee4d999 ("net: convert resend IGMP to notifier event") When sending a single patch change you can put all the information in the commit message of the patch, the cover letter is only necessary for series of multiple patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists