lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 15:06:41 +0200 From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 1/2] udp: call udp_encap_enable for v6 sockets when enabling encap Hi, On 29/03/2022 15:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> I would like to propose to take this patch in stable releases. >> Greg, is this an option? >> >> Commit in the linux kernel is: >> a4a600dd301ccde6ea239804ec1f19364a39d643 > > > What stable tree(s) should this apply to, and where have you tested it? Sorry for the delay, Greg, but I wanted to run some extra tests on the various longterm kernel releases. This bug exists since "ever", therefore ideally it could/should be applied to all stable trees. However, this patch applies as-is only to v5.10 and v5.4 (you need to ignore the hunk for 'drivers/net/bareudp.c' on the latter). Older trees require a different code change. My tests on v5.10 and v5.4 show that the patch works as expected. Therefore, could it be backported to these 2 trees? It can get my Tested-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net> Thanks a lot, -- Antonio Quartulli OpenVPN Inc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists