netdev - Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 1/2] udp: call udp_encap_enable for v6 sockets when enabling encap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 2 Apr 2022 13:28:45 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>
Cc:     Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 1/2] udp: call udp_encap_enable for v6 sockets
 when enabling encap

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 03:06:41PM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 29/03/2022 15:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > I would like to propose to take this patch in stable releases.
> > > Greg, is this an option?
> > > 
> > > Commit in the linux kernel is:
> > > a4a600dd301ccde6ea239804ec1f19364a39d643
> > 
> > 
> > What stable tree(s) should this apply to, and where have you tested it?
> 
> Sorry for the delay, Greg, but I wanted to run some extra tests on the
> various longterm kernel releases.
> 
> This bug exists since "ever", therefore ideally it could/should be applied
> to all stable trees.
> 
> However, this patch applies as-is only to v5.10 and v5.4 (you need to ignore
> the hunk for 'drivers/net/bareudp.c' on the latter).
> 
> Older trees require a different code change.
> 
> My tests on v5.10 and v5.4 show that the patch works as expected.
> 
> Therefore, could it be backported to these 2 trees?
> It can get my
> 
> Tested-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>

Now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h