lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 13:28:45 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net> Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net-next 1/2] udp: call udp_encap_enable for v6 sockets when enabling encap On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 03:06:41PM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > Hi, > > On 29/03/2022 15:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > I would like to propose to take this patch in stable releases. > > > Greg, is this an option? > > > > > > Commit in the linux kernel is: > > > a4a600dd301ccde6ea239804ec1f19364a39d643 > > > > > > What stable tree(s) should this apply to, and where have you tested it? > > Sorry for the delay, Greg, but I wanted to run some extra tests on the > various longterm kernel releases. > > This bug exists since "ever", therefore ideally it could/should be applied > to all stable trees. > > However, this patch applies as-is only to v5.10 and v5.4 (you need to ignore > the hunk for 'drivers/net/bareudp.c' on the latter). > > Older trees require a different code change. > > My tests on v5.10 and v5.4 show that the patch works as expected. > > Therefore, could it be backported to these 2 trees? > It can get my > > Tested-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net> Now queued up, thanks. greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists