[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220331105134.GA7711@wunner.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 12:51:34 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: ordering of check in phy_state_machine() since
06edf1a940be0633499e2feea31d380375a22bd9
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:33:30PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> looking at this I wonder whether the check isn't too late.
> Do you really want to restart autonegotiation although
> you know that the device is gone?
Ignoring PHY_CABLETEST for a moment, needs_aneg is only set to
true if state is PHY_UP, i.e. the netdev was just opened.
If the USB adapter is unplugged at that moment, the expectation
is that phy_start_aneg() returns -ENODEV, so we bail out of
phy_state_machine().
Commit 06edf1a940be looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists