netdev - Re: ordering of check in phy_state_machine() since 06edf1a940be0633499e2feea31d380375a22bd9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 31 Mar 2022 12:51:34 +0200
From:   Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To:     Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc:     Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: ordering of check in phy_state_machine() since
 06edf1a940be0633499e2feea31d380375a22bd9

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:33:30PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> looking at this I wonder whether the check isn't too late.
> Do you really want to restart autonegotiation although
> you know that the device is gone?

Ignoring PHY_CABLETEST for a moment, needs_aneg is only set to
true if state is PHY_UP, i.e. the netdev was just opened.

If the USB adapter is unplugged at that moment, the expectation
is that phy_start_aneg() returns -ENODEV, so we bail out of
phy_state_machine().

Commit 06edf1a940be looks fine to me.

Thanks,

Lukas