lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 11:29:23 -0300 From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>, vladbu@...dia.com, dcaratti@...hat.com, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, lariel@...dia.com Subject: [PATCH net] net/sched: fix initialization order when updating chain 0 head Currently, when inserting a new filter that needs to sit at the head of chain 0, it will first update the heads pointer on all devices using the (shared) block, and only then complete the initialization of the new element so that it has a "next" element. This can lead to a situation that the chain 0 head is propagated to another CPU before the "next" initialization is done. When this race condition is triggered, packets being matched on that CPU will simply miss all other filters, and will flow through the stack as if there were no other filters installed. If the system is using OVS + TC, such packets will get handled by vswitchd via upcall, which results in much higher latency and reordering. For other applications it may result in packet drops. This is reproducible with a tc only setup, but it varies from system to system. It could be reproduced with a shared block amongst 10 veth tunnels, and an ingress filter mirroring packets to another veth. That's because using the last added veth tunnel to the shared block to do the actual traffic, it makes the race window bigger and easier to trigger. The fix is rather simple, to just initialize the next pointer of the new filter instance (tp) before propagating the head change. The fixes tag is pointing to the original code though this issue should only be observed when using it unlocked. Fixes: 2190d1d0944f ("net: sched: introduce helpers to work with filter chains") Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com> Reviewed-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com> --- net/sched/cls_api.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c index 2957f8f5cea759315463d5e61fa1db745746e6f7..f0699f39afdb082067e581a5ff1ce217351c4a19 100644 --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c @@ -1672,10 +1672,10 @@ static int tcf_chain_tp_insert(struct tcf_chain *chain, if (chain->flushing) return -EAGAIN; + RCU_INIT_POINTER(tp->next, tcf_chain_tp_prev(chain, chain_info)); if (*chain_info->pprev == chain->filter_chain) tcf_chain0_head_change(chain, tp); tcf_proto_get(tp); - RCU_INIT_POINTER(tp->next, tcf_chain_tp_prev(chain, chain_info)); rcu_assign_pointer(*chain_info->pprev, tp); return 0; -- 2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists