[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164964781231.15976.11920610137850939633.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 03:30:12 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] bpf: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK cleanups
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>:
On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 12:59:54 +0000 you wrote:
> We have switched to memcg-based memory accouting and thus the rlimit is
> not needed any more. LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK was introduced in
> libbpf for backward compatibility, so we can use it instead now.
>
> This patchset cleanups the usage of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK in tools/bpf/,
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf and samples/bpf. The file
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_rlimit.h is removed. The included header
> sys/resource.h is removed from many files as it is useless in these files.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v4,1/4] samples/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b25acdafd373
- [bpf-next,v4,2/4] selftests/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b858ba8c52b6
- [bpf-next,v4,3/4] bpftool: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a777e18f1bcd
- [bpf-next,v4,4/4] tools/runqslower: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/451b5fbc2c56
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists