[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5572c06750a388056001d1b460d5e67c18fa2836.camel@strongswan.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 11:05:22 +0200
From: Martin Willi <martin@...ongswan.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: Update ip6_route_me_harder to consider L3
domain
Hi David,
> > @@ -39,6 +38,13 @@ int ip6_route_me_harder(struct net *net, struct
> > sock *sk_partial, struct sk_buff
> > };
> > int err;
> >
> > + if (sk && sk->sk_bound_dev_if)
> > + fl6.flowi6_oif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
> > + else if (strict)
> > + fl6.flowi6_oif = dev->ifindex;
> > + else
> > + fl6.flowi6_oif = l3mdev_master_ifindex(dev);
>
> For top of tree, this is now fl6.flowi6_l3mdev
Ah, I see, missed that.
Given that IPv4 should be converted to flowi4_l3mdev as well (?), what
about:
* Keep the IPv6 patch in this form, as this allows stable to pick it
up as-is
* I'll add a follow-up patch, which converts both to flowi[46]_l3mdev
This would avoid some noise for a separate stable patch, but let me
know what you prefer.
> and dev is only needed here so make this:
> fl6.flowi6_l3mdev = l3mdev_master_ifindex(skb_dst(skb)->dev);
Actually it is used in that "strict" branch, this is why I've added
"dev" as a local variable. I guess that is still needed
with flowi6_l3mdev?
Thanks,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists