[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8faa4219-9b67-7ba8-7058-e350623c437c@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 09:37:33 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Martin Willi <martin@...ongswan.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: Update ip6_route_me_harder to consider L3
domain
On 4/13/22 3:05 AM, Martin Willi wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>>> @@ -39,6 +38,13 @@ int ip6_route_me_harder(struct net *net, struct
>>> sock *sk_partial, struct sk_buff
>>> };
>>> int err;
>>>
>>> + if (sk && sk->sk_bound_dev_if)
>>> + fl6.flowi6_oif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
>>> + else if (strict)
>>> + fl6.flowi6_oif = dev->ifindex;
>>> + else
>>> + fl6.flowi6_oif = l3mdev_master_ifindex(dev);
>>
>> For top of tree, this is now fl6.flowi6_l3mdev
>
> Ah, I see, missed that.
>
> Given that IPv4 should be converted to flowi4_l3mdev as well (?), what
> about:
>
> * Keep the IPv6 patch in this form, as this allows stable to pick it
> up as-is
> * I'll add a follow-up patch, which converts both to flowi[46]_l3mdev
sure, backport to stable will be easier.
>
> This would avoid some noise for a separate stable patch, but let me
> know what you prefer.
>
>> and dev is only needed here so make this:
>> fl6.flowi6_l3mdev = l3mdev_master_ifindex(skb_dst(skb)->dev);
>
> Actually it is used in that "strict" branch, this is why I've added
> "dev" as a local variable. I guess that is still needed
> with flowi6_l3mdev?
ah, missed the strict branch use.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists