[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJq09z7rckskEguiEtrT0ynehbKqSFq1Sec8L1wQZr8nZzbs7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 03:27:24 -0300
From: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Alvin Šipraga <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"tobias@...dekranz.com" <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"vladimir.oltean@....com" <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: realtek: add compatible strings for RTL8367RB-VB
> So to me, this is fine. But i might add a bit more detail, that the
> compatible is used by the driver to find the ID register, and the
> driver then uses to ID register to decide how to drive the switch. The
> problem i had with the mv88e6xxx binding was until i spelt this out in
> the binding, people kept submitting patches adding new compatible
> strings, rather than extend the documented list of switches supported
> by a compatible.
Thanks, Andrew.
I just sent two patches to deal with the cleanup.
Regards,
Luiz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists