[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87czhfy3e3.fsf@igel.home>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 20:24:20 +0200
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: fix signed/unsigned comparison
On Apr 17 2022, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index cf2dc19bb8c766c1d33406053fd61c0873f15489..0d88984e071531fb727bdee178b0c01fd087fe5f 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -5959,7 +5959,7 @@ void tcp_rcv_established(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> step5:
> reason = tcp_ack(sk, skb, FLAG_SLOWPATH | FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT);
> - if (reason < 0)
> + if ((int)reason < 0)
> goto discard;
>
> tcp_rcv_rtt_measure_ts(sk, skb);
Shouldn't reason be negated before passing it to tcp_drop_reason?
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
Powered by blists - more mailing lists