| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 01:16:50 +0530
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/7] bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:13:37AM IST, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Allow attaching to lsm hooks in the cgroup context.
>
> Attaching to per-cgroup LSM works exactly like attaching
> to other per-cgroup hooks. New BPF_LSM_CGROUP is added
> to trigger new mode; the actual lsm hook we attach to is
> signaled via existing attach_btf_id.
>
> For the hooks that have 'struct socket' as its first argument,
> we use the cgroup associated with that socket. For the rest,
> we use 'current' cgroup (this is all on default hierarchy == v2 only).
> Note that for the hooks that work on 'struct sock' we still
> take the cgroup from 'current' because most of the time,
> the 'sock' argument is not properly initialized.
>
> Behind the scenes, we allocate a shim program that is attached
> to the trampoline and runs cgroup effective BPF programs array.
> This shim has some rudimentary ref counting and can be shared
> between several programs attaching to the same per-cgroup lsm hook.
>
> Note that this patch bloats cgroup size because we add 211
> cgroup_bpf_attach_type(s) for simplicity sake. This will be
> addressed in the subsequent patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h | 6 ++
> include/linux/bpf.h | 13 +++
> include/linux/bpf_lsm.h | 14 ++++
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 11 +++
> kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 10 +++
> kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 +
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> 11 files changed, 397 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h
> index 695d1224a71b..6c661b4df9fa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>
> struct bpf_prog_array;
>
> +#define CGROUP_LSM_NUM 211 /* will be addressed in the next patch */
> +
> enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type {
> CGROUP_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE_INVALID = -1,
> CGROUP_INET_INGRESS = 0,
> @@ -35,6 +37,10 @@ enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type {
> CGROUP_INET4_GETSOCKNAME,
> CGROUP_INET6_GETSOCKNAME,
> CGROUP_INET_SOCK_RELEASE,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_LSM
> + CGROUP_LSM_START,
> + CGROUP_LSM_END = CGROUP_LSM_START + CGROUP_LSM_NUM - 1,
> +#endif
> MAX_CGROUP_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 487aba40ce52..17bbe2f7b2be 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -807,6 +807,9 @@ static __always_inline __nocfi unsigned int bpf_dispatcher_nop_func(
> #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT
> int bpf_trampoline_link_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_trampoline *tr);
> int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_trampoline *tr);
> +int bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim(struct bpf_prog *prog,
> + struct bpf_attach_target_info *tgt_info);
> +void bpf_trampoline_unlink_cgroup_shim(struct bpf_prog *prog);
> struct bpf_trampoline *bpf_trampoline_get(u64 key,
> struct bpf_attach_target_info *tgt_info);
> void bpf_trampoline_put(struct bpf_trampoline *tr);
> @@ -865,6 +868,14 @@ static inline int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_prog *prog,
> {
> return -ENOTSUPP;
> }
> +static inline int bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim(struct bpf_prog *prog,
> + struct bpf_attach_target_info *tgt_info)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +static inline void bpf_trampoline_unlink_cgroup_shim(struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +{
> +}
> static inline struct bpf_trampoline *bpf_trampoline_get(u64 key,
> struct bpf_attach_target_info *tgt_info)
> {
> @@ -980,6 +991,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
> u64 load_time; /* ns since boottime */
> u32 verified_insns;
> struct bpf_map *cgroup_storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE];
> + int cgroup_atype; /* enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type */
> char name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
> #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> void *security;
> @@ -2383,6 +2395,7 @@ void *bpf_arch_text_copy(void *dst, void *src, size_t len);
>
> struct btf_id_set;
> bool btf_id_set_contains(const struct btf_id_set *set, u32 id);
> +int btf_id_set_index(const struct btf_id_set *set, u32 id);
>
> #define MAX_BPRINTF_VARARGS 12
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> index 479c101546ad..7f0e59f5f9be 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_inode_storage_get_proto;
> extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_inode_storage_delete_proto;
> void bpf_inode_storage_free(struct inode *inode);
>
> +int bpf_lsm_find_cgroup_shim(const struct bpf_prog *prog, bpf_func_t *bpf_func);
> +int bpf_lsm_hook_idx(u32 btf_id);
> +
> #else /* !CONFIG_BPF_LSM */
>
> static inline bool bpf_lsm_is_sleepable_hook(u32 btf_id)
> @@ -65,6 +68,17 @@ static inline void bpf_inode_storage_free(struct inode *inode)
> {
> }
>
> +static inline int bpf_lsm_find_cgroup_shim(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> + bpf_func_t *bpf_func)
> +{
> + return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int bpf_lsm_hook_idx(u32 btf_id)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_LSM */
>
> #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_LSM_H */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index d14b10b85e51..bbe48a2dd852 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -998,6 +998,7 @@ enum bpf_attach_type {
> BPF_SK_REUSEPORT_SELECT_OR_MIGRATE,
> BPF_PERF_EVENT,
> BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI,
> + BPF_LSM_CGROUP,
> __MAX_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE
> };
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> index 064eccba641d..eca258ba71d8 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,98 @@ BTF_SET_START(bpf_lsm_hooks)
> #undef LSM_HOOK
> BTF_SET_END(bpf_lsm_hooks)
>
> +static unsigned int __cgroup_bpf_run_lsm_socket(const void *ctx,
> + const struct bpf_insn *insn)
> +{
> + const struct bpf_prog *prog;
> + struct socket *sock;
> + struct cgroup *cgrp;
> + struct sock *sk;
> + int ret = 0;
> + u64 *regs;
> +
> + regs = (u64 *)ctx;
> + sock = (void *)(unsigned long)regs[BPF_REG_0];
> + /*prog = container_of(insn, struct bpf_prog, insnsi);*/
> + prog = (const struct bpf_prog *)((void *)insn - offsetof(struct bpf_prog, insnsi));
> +
> + if (unlikely(!sock))
> + return 0;
> +
> + sk = sock->sk;
> + if (unlikely(!sk))
> + return 0;
> +
> + cgrp = sock_cgroup_ptr(&sk->sk_cgrp_data);
> + if (likely(cgrp))
> + ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_CG(cgrp->bpf.effective[prog->aux->cgroup_atype],
> + ctx, bpf_prog_run, 0);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int __cgroup_bpf_run_lsm_current(const void *ctx,
> + const struct bpf_insn *insn)
> +{
> + const struct bpf_prog *prog;
> + struct cgroup *cgrp;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!current))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*prog = container_of(insn, struct bpf_prog, insnsi);*/
> + prog = (const struct bpf_prog *)((void *)insn - offsetof(struct bpf_prog, insnsi));
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + cgrp = task_dfl_cgroup(current);
> + if (likely(cgrp))
> + ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_CG(cgrp->bpf.effective[prog->aux->cgroup_atype],
> + ctx, bpf_prog_run, 0);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int bpf_lsm_find_cgroup_shim(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> + bpf_func_t *bpf_func)
> +{
> + const struct btf_type *first_arg_type;
> + const struct btf_type *sock_type;
> + const struct btf *btf_vmlinux;
> + const struct btf_param *args;
> + s32 type_id;
> +
> + if (!prog->aux->attach_func_proto ||
> + !btf_type_is_func_proto(prog->aux->attach_func_proto))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (btf_type_vlen(prog->aux->attach_func_proto) < 1)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + args = (const struct btf_param *)(prog->aux->attach_func_proto + 1);
> +
> + btf_vmlinux = bpf_get_btf_vmlinux();
> + if (!btf_vmlinux)
We should use IS_ERR_OR_NULL to check the result, e.g. see:
7ada3787e91c ("bpf: Check for NULL return from bpf_get_btf_vmlinux").
> [...]
--
Kartikeya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists