[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iLue8fy-6TTEsTwzWAog-KnAcsG19up34621W8Bp+0=NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 10:11:55 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: generalize skb freeing deferral to
per-cpu lists
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 9:53 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 8:34 AM Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org> wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > Eric, with this patch I'm seeing memory leaks such as these [1][2] after
> > boot. The system is using the igb driver for its management interface
> > [3]. The leaks disappear after reverting the patch.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
>
> No idea, skbs allocated to send an ACK can not be stored in receive
> queue, I guess this is a kmemleak false positive.
>
> Stress your host for hours, and check if there are real kmemleaks, as
> in memory being depleted.
AT first when I saw your report I wondered if the following was needed,
but I do not think so. Nothing in __kfree_skb(skb) cares about skb->next.
But you might give it a try, maybe I am wrong.
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 611bd719706412723561c27753150b27e1dc4e7a..9dc3443649b962586cc059899ac3d71e9c7a3559
100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6594,6 +6594,7 @@ static void skb_defer_free_flush(struct softnet_data *sd)
while (skb != NULL) {
next = skb->next;
+ skb_mark_not_on_list(skb);
__kfree_skb(skb);
skb = next;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists