netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/7] secure_seq: return the full 64-bit of the siphash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yml6+PKmxW7VSHch@zx2c4.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 19:18:48 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Moshe Kol <moshe.kol@...l.huji.ac.il>,
        Yossi Gilad <yossi.gilad@...l.huji.ac.il>,
        Amit Klein <aksecurity@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/7] secure_seq: return the full 64-bit of the siphash

Hi Willy,

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:52:27AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> diff --git a/include/net/secure_seq.h b/include/net/secure_seq.h
> index d7d2495f83c2..5cea9ed9c773 100644
> --- a/include/net/secure_seq.h
> +++ b/include/net/secure_seq.h
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  
> -u32 secure_ipv4_port_ephemeral(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr, __be16 dport);
> +u64 secure_ipv4_port_ephemeral(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr, __be16 dport);
>  u32 secure_ipv6_port_ephemeral(const __be32 *saddr, const __be32 *daddr,
>  			       __be16 dport);
>  u32 secure_tcp_seq(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
> diff --git a/net/core/secure_seq.c b/net/core/secure_seq.c
> index 9b8443774449..2cdd43a63f64 100644
> --- a/net/core/secure_seq.c
> +++ b/net/core/secure_seq.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ u32 secure_tcp_seq(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(secure_tcp_seq);
>  
> -u32 secure_ipv4_port_ephemeral(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr, __be16 dport)
> +u64 secure_ipv4_port_ephemeral(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr, __be16 dport)
>  {
>  	net_secret_init();
>  	return siphash_3u32((__force u32)saddr, (__force u32)daddr,

Should you be doing the same with secure_ipv6_port_ephemeral() too? Why
the asymmetry?

Jason