netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/6] bpf: Add selftests for raw syncookie helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:19:21 +0300
From:   Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Petar Penkov <ppenkov@...gle.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Joe Stringer <joe@...ium.io>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/6] bpf: Add selftests for raw syncookie
 helpers

On 2022-04-27 01:11, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:29 AM Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2022-04-26 09:26, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 5:12 PM Alexei Starovoitov
>>> <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 08:24:21PM +0300, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
>>>>> +void test_xdp_synproxy(void)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +     int server_fd = -1, client_fd = -1, accept_fd = -1;
>>>>> +     struct nstoken *ns = NULL;
>>>>> +     FILE *ctrl_file = NULL;
>>>>> +     char buf[1024];
>>>>> +     size_t size;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     SYS("ip netns add synproxy");
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     SYS("ip link add tmp0 type veth peer name tmp1");
>>>>> +     SYS("ip link set tmp1 netns synproxy");
>>>>> +     SYS("ip link set tmp0 up");
>>>>> +     SYS("ip addr replace 198.18.0.1/24 dev tmp0");
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     // When checksum offload is enabled, the XDP program sees wrong
>>>>> +     // checksums and drops packets.
>>>>> +     SYS("ethtool -K tmp0 tx off");
>>>>
>>>> BPF CI image doesn't have ethtool installed.
>>>> It will take some time to get it updated. Until then we cannot land the patch set.
>>>> Can you think of a way to run this test without shelling to ethtool?
>>>
>>> Good news: we got updated CI image with ethtool, so that shouldn't be
>>> a problem anymore.
>>>
>>> Bad news: this selftest still fails, but in different place:
>>>
>>> test_synproxy:FAIL:iptables -t raw -I PREROUTING -i tmp1 -p tcp -m tcp
>>> --syn --dport 8080 -j CT --notrack unexpected error: 512 (errno 2)
>>
>> That's simply a matter of missing kernel config options:
>>
>> CONFIG_NETFILTER_SYNPROXY=y
>> CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CT=y
>> CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_STATE=y
>> CONFIG_IP_NF_FILTER=y
>> CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_SYNPROXY=y
>> CONFIG_IP_NF_RAW=y
>>
>> Shall I create a pull request on github to add these options to
>> https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/tree/master/travis-ci/vmtest/configs?
>>
> 
> Yes, please. But also for [0], that's the one that tests all the
> not-yet-applied patches
> 
>    [0] https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/

Created pull requests:

https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/pull/79
https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/pull/490

>>> See [0].
>>>
>>>     [0] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/runs/6169439612?check_suite_focus=true
>>