[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YnAh9Q1lwz6Wu9R8@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 20:24:53 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>
Subject: Re: FEC MDIO read timeout on linkup
> writing to this register could trigger a FEC_ENET_MII interrupt actually
> creating a race condition with fec_enet_mdio_read() that is called on
> link change also.
Another point to consider:
static int fec_enet_mdio_wait(struct fec_enet_private *fep)
{
uint ievent;
int ret;
ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT, ievent,
ievent & FEC_ENET_MII, 2, 30000);
if (!ret)
writel(FEC_ENET_MII, fep->hwp + FEC_IEVENT);
return ret;
}
An unexpected interrupt will make this exit too early, and the read
will get invalid data. An unexpected interrupt would not cause a
timeout here, which is what you are reporting.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists